The Supreme Court of Maryland today granted expedited bypass review in one case, adding it to the Court’s argument calendar for June 5, the last scheduled argument day for the September 2024 Term. A space opened up on the Court’s calendar upon the voluntary dismissal last week of In re Expungement Petition of Bradley B., which had been scheduled for argument on June 5.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Maryland granted two civil petitions, including in climate change litigation. Both matters have been scheduled for argument in October.

The Supreme Court of Maryland on Friday granted review in five different appeals. The grant in the sealed In re: Criminal Investigation matter is on four different petitions. The questions differ slightly among the four petitions; we have listed the questions presented on No. 7, which is the most comprehensive.

Last Friday, the Supreme Court of Maryland granted review in two civil cases. It has assigned both cases for argument during the 2025 Term, which begins in September.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Maryland granted review in five cases. (We’ve updated this post now that “Questions Presented” are publicly available for all five cases.)

The Supreme Court of Maryland yesterday granted certiorari in four appeals.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Maryland granted review in two civil cases and one criminal case.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Maryland granted review in one criminal and one civil appeal.

Today the Supreme Court of Maryland granted review in three appeals, including a case that Chris Mincher covered in his post, Coyle v. State: Ineffective Certiorari Counsel is Inconsequential. Today’s grants follow an earlier grant on August 12. The four grants, with questions presented, appear after the jump.